Contrary to popular belief, scientific research on 5G high millimeter wave frequencies has been conducted. These studies point to health hazards that would prohibit the new Network’s roll-out based on elevated levels of radiation that no longer fall under Safety Guidelines. Instead of heeding the research on 5G, steps are being taken by governments to increase the amount of allowed radiation to enable the ‘legal’ installation of the Internet of Things.

Here are some excerpts from 5G published studies as listed on the Environmental Health Trust site, a non-profit EMF Watchdog Group:

5G Wireless Expansion: Public Health and Environmental Implications published in Environmental Research is a research review that documents the range of reported adverse effects of RF and millimeter waves—effects range from cancer to bacterial growth changes to DNA damage. The study concludes that “a moratorium on the deployment of 5G is warranted” and “the addition of this added high frequency 5G radiation to an already complex mix of lower frequencies, will contribute to a negative public health outcome … from both physical and mental health perspectives” (Russell,2018).

“Adverse Health Effects of 5G Mobile Networking Technology Under Real Life Conditions” published in Toxicology Letters identifies the wide-spectrum of adverse health effects of non-ionizing non-visible radiation and concludes that 5G mobile networking technology will affect not only the skin and eyes, but will have adverse systemic effects as well. They state that 5G will increase the cell tower densities by an order of magnitude.

The researchers conclude that in aggregate, for the high frequency (radiofrequency-RF) part of the spectrum, currently published reviews show that RF radiation below the FCC guidelines can result in: carcinogenicity (brain tumors/glioma,breast cancer, acoustic neuromas, leukemia, parotid gland tumors), genotoxicity (DNA damage, DNA repair inhibition, chromatin structure), mutagenicity, teratogenicity, neurodegenerative diseases (Alzheimer’s Disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis),neurobehavioral problems, autism, reproductive problems, pregnancy outcomes,excessive reactive oxygen species/oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, blood-brainbarrier disruption, pineal gland/melatonin production, sleep disturbance, headache,irritability, fatigue, concentration difficulties, depression, dizziness, tinnitus, burning and flushed skin, digestive disturbance, tremor, cardiac irregularities, adverse impacts on the neural, circulatory, immune, endocrine, and skeletal systems” and “from this perspective RF is a highly pervasive cause of disease” (Kostoff et al., 2020).

“Towards 5G Communication Systems: Are There Health Implications?” published in the International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health is a research review detailing research findings that millimeter waves can alter gene expression, promote cellular proliferation and synthesis of proteins linked with oxidative stress, inflammatory and metabolic processes.” The researchers conclude, “available findings seem sufficient to demonstrate the existence of biomedical effects, to invoke the precautionary principle” (Di Ciaula, 2018).

“Systematic Derivation of Safety Limits for Time-Varying 5G Radiofrequency Exposure Based on Analytical Models and Thermal Dose” published in Health Physics documents show significant tissue heating can be generated by 5G technology’s rapid short bursts of energy. “The results also show that the peak-to-average ratio of 1,000 tolerated by the International Council on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection guidelines may lead to permanent tissue damage after even short exposures, highlighting the importance of revisiting existing exposure guidelines” (Neufeld and Kuster, 2018).

The Environmental Health Trust recently submitted to the FCC extensive scientific research documenting the adverse health effects of 5G radiation in an effort to get the FCC to halt the 5G roll-out. The Environmental Health Trust has stated that, “The FCC cannot claim to have not seen the science. If the FCC chooses to ignore that science, EHT will be ready to respond again.”

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply